Sarah Palin, unable to learn the problem of inciting political rhetoric, raises the ante to inciting religious rhetoric: Sarah Palin Accuses Media of “Blood Libel” after Tucson Shooting
No amount of lipstick can cover this pig.
Sarah Palin, unable to learn the problem of inciting political rhetoric, raises the ante to inciting religious rhetoric: Sarah Palin Accuses Media of “Blood Libel” after Tucson Shooting
No amount of lipstick can cover this pig.
And now a word about people who made a difference with their bravery, knowledge, and care for the fellows.
A calm and composed congressional intern who underwent basic nursing training while in high school said Monday that he knew that if U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was to have any chance of surviving her gunshot wound, he would have to stem the flow of blood coming from her head.
“I could tell she had a very severe gunshot but I was just trying do my best until emergency medical services could arrive,” Daniel Hernandez, 20, told TODAY’s Matt Lauer via satellite.
That is, contrasted with the people who use rhetoric or pictures or cartoons to score political points.
What??? Really???
I don’t blame Sarah Palin for the tragic shooting in Tuscon, AZ.
I do blame Sarah Palin for her rhetoric that uses guns and shootin’ metaphors. I blame Sarah Palin for raising the temperature of the political debate without shedding any more light. I blame Sarah Palin for pretending that her rifle targets are merely surveyor’s maps.
Thus, Sarah Palin needs to label her rhetoric honestly: